The mission of the Anderson University School of Theology is to educate at the graduate professional level both men and women for Christian ministry. To this end, we are committed to being a community of scholars who are church-related, and in whose character and servanthood the following are vitally linked: biblical faith, academic integrity, Christian spirituality, love for persons; and a responsible relation with the created order and all humankind.
The Anderson University School of Theology website has been created to comply with the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) standards for HTML and CSS.
If you are using an older browser, you may not experience full site optimization.

Writing Guide - Introduction

Introduction: The Nature of Graduate Study

At several points, graduate study is different from the kind of education the student may have pursued as an undergraduate. Moreover, graduate theological students must consider a particular list of virtues important to them as developing scholar-ministers. It will be well to review here these ideas as an introduction both to this manual and to expectations made of graduate theological students.

Characteristics of Graduate Study

Critical

Graduate study is critical. It seeks to apply critical techniques and methodology to the subject under consideration. Criticism in this sense is analytical and seeks answers to the question, "What is really going on here?" This criticism is undertaken in the spirit of curiosity rather than reproof, for the real goal of criticism is to further understanding and to open up completely new lines of inquiry.

Another dimension of criticism is a certain measure of objectivity on the part of the student. In realizing this lies the importance of acquiring a method. Methodology assists the student in acquiring some objectivity, to stand over against that which is being researched or otherwise studied. Of course, total objectivity is impossible; that is one of the commonplaces of modern epistemology. But to concede that point is not to say that students have no responsibility to create a scholarly distance between themselves and the material under consideration.

A third dimension of criticism is that it represents the student's application of the findings of others, i.e. scholarship, to his or her own subject of study. Critical study is informed study; it does not and cannot occur in a vacuum. Students must apply the findings of others to their own knowledge and conduct, engaging in discussion, as it were, with others through their recorded work about that which is of common interest.

A final dimension of criticism is its basic attitude, one which requires proof. Critical students always ask authors, professors, colleagues, and themselves, "Why should I believe that? What convincing reasons are given for believing this rather than something else?" In short, critical study supplies questions instead of credulity, tentativeness rather than dogmatism.

Independent

Graduate study takes place in the community of scholarship. But that does not mean it is not independent. Independent, not arbitrary. Immanuel Kant's great motto was "Dare to think for yourself." One may not arbitrarily will to believe whatever one chooses or thinks must be believed. But graduate study does value independent, i.e., creative, thought.

This means that graduate study and research must proceed beyond merely collecting that which already has been considered. The graduate student must be prepared to state, with reasons, what he or she thinks or has concluded about matters, however tentative those conclusions may be. It is to be expected that among a student's reasons will be found some of the findings of other scholars. Of particular importance is the distinction between the work of others and that of the student. This distinction is the responsibility of the student and the failure to make it is a most serious breach of academic ethics known as plagiarism.

The work of other individuals, whether as words or ideas, which contributed to the student's presentation must be acknowledged through quotation or citation. The former are those instances where the exact words of another are presented in a larger body of work. The latter are used to acknowledge ideas or conclusions not necessarily quoted but which still contribute to the student's research. Because the work of another is not quoted verbatim does not relieve the student of the responsibility to indicate by citation his or her indebtedness.

Tentative

One of the differences between preaching and teaching is that sermons may conclude with a resounding "Thus says the Lord!" while lectures never do. They are more likely to end in the question, "What do you think?" Graduate study is in the spirit of the teacher more than that of the preacher. It is profoundly dialogical. One may conclude some things, and very firmly at that. But the conclusions are always open-ended. Always there exists the possibility of new discovery of better argument that will bring us to deeper insight or clearer awareness.

Thus, graduate students pursue study with a tentativeness akin to the virtue of humility. The business of graduate study is not polemics or propaganda; it is to get at tentative answers to important questions. Human knowledge has advanced greatly over the centuries and accelerated in more recent decades. But it is far from perfect. Therefore, graduate students are advised to make their "sympathies...with those who are not sure that they understand themselves and the universe rather than with those who make hard things easy" (Henry F. May 1976: xvii).

             Virtues of a Graduate Student

In late 1984, the noted historian, Jaroslav Pelikan gave an address to the Lutheran Church in America Board of Publication. The title of the speech was "The Vocation of Scholarship in the Church." Theological students may be well instructed by that title. Scholarship is a vocation, a calling to a certain kind of life. This particular kind of life is one of which the church has great need. Therefore it is highly inappropriate to suggest that theological students either leave or postpone ministry when they enroll in seminary. Their theological studies are ministry in the full sense.

Since theological students are called to a particular ministerial lifestyle, the virtues of that character ought to be known or, perhaps, reviewed. For these say something about the nature of the graduate student. Pelikan listed these virtues as discipline, patience, curiosity, and imagination.

Discipline is the willingness to be introduced—more than casually—to the men and women of the Christian tradition. Patience is the resistance to the easy and pat solution or means to the end, the willingness to research and study to discover rather than merely to complete assignments. Curiosity is the willingness to keep turning over new rocks, to resist the temptation to say, "I am finished." It is the process of learning, never finalized, always provisional and at home in that temporality. Imagination is asking new questions of old material, approaching it from a new angle of attack (Pelikan 1985:12).

These are some of the virtues of graduate theological students called to serve the church through scholarship. Undoubtedly there are others, but these are offered as an introduction and challenge to those who have come to study at Anderson University School of Theology.

             — Merle D. Strege




Critical Thinking

Students often have some initial problems with the idea that graduate study in a theological seminary is "critical" in nature. Our ministerial "calling," they say, is to affirm and confess, not criticize. It is, however, the very nature of graduate education that it demands of us that we think carefully and analytically about what it is we are affirming and confessing. Often, in the critical light of day, the content of our affirmations demands rethinking. In addition, the whys of our affirmations and confessions often need careful scrutiny. Those, for example, who proclaim their truth as absolute and universal, to the exclusion of all others, may be engaging in an ideological game. Thus, the personal and collective psychologies of truth-making need careful scrutiny. The purpose of such critical thinking is to enable us to make a necessary distinction between tradition and truth. Even Jesus, in his engagement with the Pharisees had to engage in this critical struggle.

© 2004 Anderson University | All rights reserved. | (800) 428-6414